Martica

Q. I saw the “Obesity in America” report on MSN that tracked how overweight the population has become using the body mass index (or BMI). But I think it's misleading to use this as a measure because it is unreliable: My BMI suggests that I am overweight, yet my body fat percentage is in the 8 percent range. Does that make sense?

A. You fall into a subset of people for whom the BMI is not a reliable indicator of fatness.

One of the toughest challenges in scientific studies is being able to measure what is being studied accurately. For example, if a researcher wants to assess a person’s risk of heart disease, there are many potential indicators he could look at—blood pressure, cholesterol, fitness level and, to get more technical, c-reactive protein or homocysteine levels in the blood. However, each of these measures is only associated with a greater risk of disease, they are not proof it will develop. In addition, sometimes the technology to conduct more accurate testing does exists, but is not practical to use in a study.

When it comes to fatness, the most common way to measure that is to step on the scale. Yet looking only at body weight can be misleading. Someone who is 6 feet tall and 165 pounds is not overweight, or more accurately, over-fat, while someone who is 5 feet and 165 pounds is.

The body mass index factors in both height and weight and has been found to be highly correlated to obesity. You can figure out your BMI through an online calculator or by doing the math yourself: Take your weight in pounds and divide it by your height in inches squared. Then multiply your answer by 703.

Obesity experts classify a person who has a BMI of less than 18.5 as underweight; normal is 18.5-24.9; overweight is 25-29.9; obese is over 30; and extremely obese is over 40. These ranges were established based on the health risks associated with different BMIs. People who are underweight have higher rates of disease and death than people with normal BMI readings. People with BMIs of 25 and above are at greater risk of developing heart disease, diabetes, high blood pressure, gallstones and osteoarthritis. People with levels over 30 are at increased risk for these conditions as well as some cancers and death, especially from heart disease.

There are definite limitations with the BMI measurement. As many fit individuals like you can attest, they may have a higher-than-expected BMI because they have a big body frame or lots of muscle mass. These people may weigh heavy but still be lean and fit. For that reason, people should take their waist circumference into account as well. High levels of fat in the abdominal region are associated with increased risks of diabetes, high blood pressure and heart disease; specifically, in men with a waist size greater than 40 inches and women with a waist size of greater than 35..

The reason that BMI is used is that it’s a convenient tool. In large epidemiological studies, such as those that may have 50,000 subjects, it’s impractical to conduct body-fat tests on each and every person. (One of the most accurate tests for body fat involves weighing someone in an underwater tank—known as hydrostatic weighing.) The equipment, staffing or funding to carry out such a massive undertaking is often not available. But asking person’s height and weight and/or measuring it is simple enough to be done with large groups of subjects. And if the study is large enough, using statistics, researchers can take into account that a subset of this group may not actually be overweight when they analyze the data. (With any study, you want to carefully look at how it was designed and conducted before accepting the conclusions. If you can get a hold of the original published study, the “Discussion” section outlines problems or limitations that the researchers themselves acknowledge. You can also read reactions of reputable scientists and other researchers to a study in other studies that may cite it. Or you can learn more about similar studies by reading more related research. You'll find original published research here.)

Although BMI may have limitations, generally, it is considered a reliable way to track the rise in obesity in the U.S. population. But if you are lean and fit, don’t worry about your BMI. The BMI is meant to express increased risks in disease and death. As a regular exerciser, you are reducing your risks of many diseases and early death.

Correction, July 28, 2006:  This article originally stated the calculation for BMI as weight in pounds multiplied by 703 then divided by height in inches. The correct formula is weight (in pounds) divided by height (in inches) squared, then multiplied by 703.This error has been corrected.

Get More Fitness and Weight-Loss Advice From Martica:

Find all articles by Martica.

Do you have a fitness or weight-loss question for Martica? Send e-mail to experts@microsoft.com. Please include Ask Martica in the subject line. Each of our experts responds to one question each week and the responses are posted on Mondays on MSN Health. We regret that we cannot provide a personalized response to every submission.


Martica is a Manhattan-based exercise physiologist and nutritionist and an award-winning fitness instructor. She has written for a variety of publications including Self , Health , Prevention , The New York Times and others. Martica is the author of seven books, including her latest, Cross-Training for Dummies . (Read her full bio.)

Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1-10 of 19
Tuesday, January 05, 2010 4:32:38 PM
Hubba, hubba!!
Tuesday, January 05, 2010 9:50:56 AM
BMI is not the golden standard, rather assessing body fat percentage and distribution (waist circumference) are better measures, especially considering disease risk. Since BMI cannot differentiate between fat, muscle and water weight, it is not specific and rather general at best. Dr. Sardone, author of The Naked Truth: Overweight, Overwhelmed and Confused
Monday, January 04, 2010 12:42:58 PM
If you cut a, one foot by one foot, portion of human muscle and human fat, the muscle will weigh more.
Monday, November 30, 2009 6:16:57 PM
A heavily muscled man can weigh more then a similar height man, but have a below normal(for his weight) then a fat man. I have  a BF of 11% and am considered overweight by BMI standards. They even ask me to reinput my waist measurement because the result does not compute. BMI as an indicator is a bad standard and like everything else standardized in medical statistics ignores the specifics associated with every human caught in the band of mass averages. They will put you on a dieticians standard liquid feed diet, as an athlete eats muscle to sustain their body composition and becomes less and less healthy. Doctors and nurses do not treat patients as unique individuals and often recommend nutrition and rehabilitation that misses the individuals specific needs. I know, as I spent 4 months in 3 hospitals in 2008, lost 40 lbs in 30 days, almost lost my life 3x and was sent to a cognitive rehabilitation program without a cardiac rehabilitation program and almost 2 years later, am not back to aerobic fitness. The AHA diet was inferior to my own protocal that I had followed for 35 years and had it not been for bacterial endocarditis, I would have been compared to a person 20 years junior in physical fitness and health. If I had not taken control of my own medical care and rehabilitation, I would be less healthy and perhaps dead, by this time. If you're not feeling up to par, another drug is prescribed and you are made further ill by the cure.
Monday, November 30, 2009 3:24:56 PM
I completely agree.  I'm a 6'0 tall woman, and wear a 36DD bra and I know they weigh a lot.  I wear a size 12 dress and according to my BMI, I am 5 pounds away from being obese.  I agree that I could stand to lose a few pounds, but obese?  BMI and other height/weight charts never take into consideration that taller people not only have longer bones to support that larger frame, but they are also bigger around and that adds pounds, not to mention your internal organs.  Until this BMI chart becomes more of a parabola and less of a straight line, it will continue to be an innacurate measure for people on both extremes of the spectrum.
Friday, November 06, 2009 4:19:36 PM
I totally agree im 13 years old, weigh 87lbs flat chested and it says im underwieght and other sights suggest theat im annerexic!! I hate when people call me skinny and im not just doing this for attention! all i want to be is normal. thats what most teenagers want too. so i dont think im underweight, yeah i may be a bit lighter but im a very active girl thats loves sports and i have a amazing matabalism too so some results ARE wrong!
Wednesday, September 09, 2009 9:48:07 PM

the bmi they gave me in a calculator was horrible....i have less than 10% body fat, i am a successful triathlete and cyclist...i am lean and very fit...18-24 was laughable..

Wednesday, September 09, 2009 4:57:24 PM

...and yes, a pound is a pound, BUT a pound of muscle takes up less space than a pound of fat, due to density.

Wednesday, September 09, 2009 4:53:03 PM
The BMI is an awful measurement for a very fit, big-busted woman like myself. 34 DD. Any idea how much they weigh?
Wednesday, September 09, 2009 3:28:06 PM

Yes, you can divide and multiply in any order. 

 

But the correction says to divide by the height (in inches) SQUARED.  The original didn't mention using the square. 

 

1-10 of 19
To add a comment, pleasesign in
weight loss videos//© msn health & fitness
4 free tools for fitness//© MSN Health & FitnessWeight Loss CalculatorsCustomized Workouts The Fit ZoneLose 10 Pounds
Find exercises and workouts in The Fit Zone // Photo by Lynda Churilla for MSN Health & Fitness
find a health club//© MSN Health & Fitness

Powered by Bing

MSN Health & Fitness does not provide medical or any other health care advice, diagnosis or treatment.



IMA Winner 2009