Eat at Your Own Risk

The 10 most hazardous foods—and how to eat them healthfully.
Burger cooked rare (© Tetra Images/Corbis)
Rare burgers
The danger: Eating raw or very rare beef is always a bit risky. Beef has the potential for carrying salmonella or E. coli contamination. And even when the meat is produced under the most ideal conditions, there is still a risk that it can harbor bacteria. The only way to fully guarantee that it is bacteria-free is to buy meat that has been irradiated. And ground beef is more risky than, say, a steak, because it is handled more, and after being ground it has greater surface area on which to harbor bacteria.



The safer solution: While a rare burger is defined as one cooked to 140 degrees or below, a burger has to be cooked to at least 160 degrees in order to kill any bacteria and be considered safe. At 160 degrees, a burger will look more brownish than pink in the center. But Frechman recommends using a meat thermometer to check your burgers before serving to ensure you've cooked them enough.
< Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next >
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1-10 of 97
Monday, September 21, 2009 10:24:57 AM
This article is a bunch of B.S to fill space
Monday, September 21, 2009 8:53:01 AM
I agreed with you
Tuesday, September 01, 2009 1:05:04 PM

The FDA, AS USUAL...who are in bed with the mega corporate food businesses of homogeneity.  Both want us to kill any form of REAL food in the end.  I will stay happy in my home with all my lacto-fermented goodness and living food.... pathetic article.

 

If you want real food, you have got to work for it.  Pay no attention to this article!

Thursday, August 27, 2009 1:00:59 PM
I'm going to be 71, a bit overweight because of spinal problems, but my entire life has been blessed with cantaloupe and all sorts of melons, fresh fruits, fresh vegetables, raw hamburger (steak tartar) once in a while, runny eggs, cheese made from unpasteurized milk, lettuce (unwashed save for getting a little dirt off), and nothing has happened yet.  If everyone were to do everything asked of him or her in this article, breakfast, lunch, and dinner were would take double the time; schedules would be screwed up; and no one would work an eight hour day because we would be washing and rewashing our food.  A little dirt is good for all of us.  How the hell did civilization survive?
Tuesday, August 04, 2009 9:35:52 AM
Whoever wrote this article, COME ON!!! And to anyone taking this article seriously, USE YOUR HEAD! This article must have been written by a paranoid schizophrenic. I've worked in the food industry for almost 6 years now and I serve raw sprouts (plus pretty much everything else listed in the article) to many people everyday! And I have NEVER seen or even heard of anyone getting sick from them. This is just plain ridiculous, please don't take this seriously, just use your common sense and wash your food thoroughly, and NOT WITH BLEACH! WOW!!!!!!!!!!! If you feel the need, you can use salt water or apple cider vinegar.
Sunday, May 03, 2009 8:59:12 PM
It seems that  poor illegal aliens are  responsible for the contaminated food supply in the USA. He is blamed for crapping and ****  in the fields  No American has ever done such a thing in his life.... if a hot one happen to strike when he was out hiking / walking /camping. Good lord stop blaming the poor illegal alien for your problems. Just practice safe hygiene and teach it in schools as early as pre school. Have a public poster campaign around cities and on telly. Please do not expose your level of education by putting blame on those poor illegals. Remember they are human beings first, one day you might need Mexico to run to and he might be the one you turn to for help.  And never say never!
Sunday, May 03, 2009 8:01:20 PM
the raw beef isn't entirly true, whole cuts only require the outside to be cooked
Sunday, May 03, 2009 7:54:41 PM
This article is just plain paranoid.   If you don't know how to handle food safely, stay out of the kitchen.   Go out to some restaurant where you really take a chance with food.   The media loves to make headlines with this type of scare.  In the past two years, 'information' is nothing but stupidity by the writer and whoever ok'S the articles.  THIS IS NOT NEWS!!!!!
Sunday, May 03, 2009 7:53:53 PM

The pasteurization process was originally intended as a way of preventing wine and beer from souring according to Wikipedia.  Pasteurization is not intended to kill all pathogens in the foods. Pasteurization reduces the number of pathogens so it's less likely to cause disease.   Pasteurization of milk eliminates the spread of diseases such as diphtheria, tuberculosis, and brucellosis (a disease that primarily infects cattle but may rarely infect humans), through contaminated milk.

And, as the point was made; it's not the food we need to worry about, it's the handling; with the exception being the egg where the infection can come from within.

Sunday, May 03, 2009 7:01:13 PM
delightedtobeafarmer --  This information is mostly about the handling of the food.  Food that is brought into this country does not meet the same high standards as those of the American farmer.  Re-read the above and you will see it is about how improrper handling can cause problems.
1-10 of 97
To add a comment, pleasesign in
nutrition videos//© msn health & fitness

MSN Health & Fitness does not provide medical or any other health care advice, diagnosis or treatment.



IMA Winner 2009