There's no question that the average American has a sweet—and a salty—tooth. The American Heart Association says we consume about 355 calories per day of sugar, more than three times its new recommended daily limit of 100 calories for women and twice the 150-calorie cap for men. And the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said in March that the average American age 2 or over consumes 3,436 milligrams of sodium per day; nearly 70 percent of adults fall into higher-risk groups that should take in only 1,500 mg per day, and the rest of us are advised to top out at 2,300 mg.

Not surprisingly, there's been a chorus of voices saying we need to make changes to what and how we eat. In April, two nutrition experts at the Harvard School of Public Health called for a switch to less sugary drinks: things like water, tea, seltzer with a splash of juice and coffee with one lump of sugar. And they called on beverage makers to create reduced-calorie drinks with no more than a gram of sugar per ounce. The goal is not to compensate with noncaloric sweeteners like asparatame or stevia. Though there's not definitive research to prove it, constantly drinking sweet beverages, even if noncaloric, may set us up to look for other similarly sweet foods and drinks during the day, says Lilian Cheung, a lecturer at Harvard and one of the proposal's authors.

There have also been numerous requests by the American Medical Association and other medical groups for manufacturers to cut the amount of sodium in processed foods by as much as half, with the aim of reducing rates of high blood pressure, heart problems and stroke. A recent report by the Institute of Medicine called on the government to cut the sodium in school meals; an average high school lunch now has about 1,600 mg of sodium, and the report says that should drop to no more than 740 mg.

But as anyone who has struggled with a yogurt-covered pretzel habit can confirm, sweet and salt can be quite the siren song. (Former FDA Commissioner David Kessler explains how the food industry takes advantage of those preferences, as well as our enjoyment of fat, in his recent book, The End of Overeating.) Even newborns have a strong positive response to sweet, says Gary Beauchamp, director of the Monell Chemical Senses Center in Philadelphia. That preference declines a bit during adolescence, for unknown reasons. And he says that though there's certainly variation in how much we like sweet, at least among older kids, we don't know what causes that; there's some evidence that there are genetic differences in sweet receptors, but it's also possible that what kids eat when they're very young can influence their sweet preferences in childhood and adulthood. Less clear is how the preference for salt develops, says Beauchamp. Not all infants like the taste, but "by the time they're 2 or 3, they show a high preference for salty foods, just like adults," he says. In fact, kids like things even saltier than adults.

However, even if a preference is innate, that doesn't mean it can't be changed through experience, says Beauchamp. Debra Zellner, a psychologist at Montclair State University who studies food cravings and taste, has done research that shows your sweet preference can indeed be jacked up by repeated exposure to sugary foods and drinks. "Your ideal point on sweetness will increase. So what originally might have tasted good to you—a very low sweetness level—after ingesting a lot of beverages that are very, very sweet won't taste good anymore," she says. In theory, the mechanism should work the other way, too, she says—though the research to prove it hasn't been done. Evidence on switching to a low-sodium diet, at least in adults, shows that it's hard to make an abrupt change, says Helen Jensen, an economics professor at Iowa State University who was on the IOM's school meals panel. That's one of the reasons the panel recommended sodium be reduced over 10 years; there's not much research on how changes in saltiness will affect palatability in kids, and "the last thing we want to do is make a change that [takes] kids out of the program, so they're not consuming school lunches at all," she says.

But an ability to change our tastes, even if over time, is what the health experts are banking on, and some manufacturers are already working on it—including a company called Owater, which has developed sports beverages that meet the low-sugar criteria. "You can adjust the palate," says Tom First, Owater's founder and CEO. "Our drinks teach your mouth a different level of sweetness," he says. "And after people get accustomed to something less sweet, when they go back and drink their old favorite, they say, 'Oh my goodness, it's so sweet,'" he says. Beverage Spectrum Magazine reports that the "healthful alternative[s] to sugar-laden drinks" category is growing.

Salt is tougher than sugar to simply remove from foods. "It's not just a taste enhancer or deliverer," says Jane Anders, vice president of research and development at ConAgra Foods, which is working to cut 20 percent of the salt in its products between 2006 and 2015. Salt also plays a key role in preservation for meat-containing products, binds ingredients and affects texture and color. "If you just take the sodium out, at best you end up with a product that doesn't taste [good], and in the worst case, you lose preservation qualities," she says. The company is using four basic technologies to meet its goals: sodium reduction by stealth or a gradual reduction over time, as with Hunt's tomatoes; a proprietary, "micronsalt" (because it's ultrafine, not as much is required to get the same taste), used in Orville Redenbacher microwave popcorn; sodium flavor replacements used in Kid Cuisine mac and cheese; and sea salt, which requires less for the same taste as regular salt, used in Chef Boyardee Mini-Bites. Other companies, including Campbell Soup, are also working to reduce salt—though plenty of others are still dragging their feet, the Center for Science in the Public Interest said in December.

Want to try your own sweet and salt reduction campaign? Scan packaged food labels for lower-sodium or lower-sugar offerings, and cook with fresh food that doesn't already include a lot of salt and added sugar. Cheung advises you to be adventurous and try new flavors: coconut, ginger, sesame, curry, passion fruit, tarragon and rosemary, for instance. "When you have ingredients like that on your palate, the levels of sweetness and saltiness aren't the centerpiece."

Courtesy of U.S. News & World Report

Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1-10 of 35
Monday, November 16, 2009 2:00:31 PM

When people want to buy more lightly sweetened products, producers will make them.  Blame whoever you want.  You can force manufacturers to make certain products, but if people don't want them, they won't buy them.  Look at McDonald's and all the ways they've tried to market salads to people and, surprise, surprise, no one buys them.

 

UM, Leoleon, or whatever your name is...correcting the spelling/grammar/syntax of others on message boards is obnoxious.  It is also dangerous in that it makes people look more closely at what YOU wrote, like:

 

@ supernursechris,   Having ADHD you would think you would be staying away from something which contributes to it...Caffeine will add to them!

WRONG

 

We all know the horrors, and more people die from smoking related disease, which burden us taxpayers, then alcohol related deaths. Check your facts.  Use your spell check!

Do you mean "than alcohol related deaths"  or do you mean that they burden us taxpayers, then subsequently they have alcohol related deaths?  Because the latter is what your sentence says. 

 

Also You would be better off taking B vitamins, to get your antioxidants instead of dark chocolate.

Are you comparing a. the amount of antioxidants in B vitamins to b. the amount of dark chocolate in B vitamins?  Well that's actually a moot question.  That is what you're saying.  What I question is whether you mean that.  Also, why capitalize "you?"  Why don't you try using your spell check?

 

It isn't that hard.   Well, apparently it is for you...

Monday, November 16, 2009 8:37:42 AM
@ mortgage payment, that's a stupid analogy... selling crack is illegal!  So, should the government make selling processed foods filled with tons of sugar and salt and saturated fats illegal??  I mean, why not?  Both cause tremendous damage to the body and are highly addictive!  Heart disease is the leading cause of death and obesity is an epidemic.  I'm not saying I blame the food manufacturers however if it wasn't so easily available or if there were more healthy alternatives on the market, the chance that people will eat something better for them is greater.
Sunday, November 15, 2009 1:47:32 PM

Stop blaming food manufactures, the government, your parents etc. Adults choose what they bring into their house, they choose what they and their children eat!

Would you walk up to a crack dealer and yell at them for selling you crack? No, that's their livelihood and they don't care about your health, they just want your money.

Food manufacturing is big business, even if they put really harmful products in grocery stores/restaurants, the most the FDA is going to do is modestly fine them. The FDA is part of the government which is supported by the taxes of big business.

When the economy tanked, we had to cut back like most people. The first to go was the colorful packaged snack foods and the occasional trip to a drive-thru.

After the kids (and my husband) balked about the 'lack of snack', I started purchasing the most basic, large quantity snacks I could find at the big box store. These are your basic tortilla chip, yes fried but they have 6 ingredients, none of which are chemicals; next is plain old pretzels, also very basic ingredients; finally is generic ruffled potato chips, I don't know why they're always ruffled but they are and they taste the same as unruffled and don't break as easily so who cares.

These are now our snack foods. I get out the food scale and a measuring cup on shopping day and measure out a single servings into baggies for the lunches and then whatever is left in the big bags goes to the pantry. If you use the zip baggies, the snack will keep fresh for at least a week.  

I also carefully choose and measure the  breakfast cereals. The criteria for cereal is 5 grams or less of sugar and at least 3 grams of protein per serving. I measure out single servings by weight and the kids choose one each morning. (If you looked at the ingredients in Captain Crunch, serving that to your child is the same as slapping them upside the head, setting fire to $5, and sending them to school hungry)

We only buy sprouted multigrain bread, its available everyday for toast/sandwiches/whatever. (My kids used to eat slice after slice of whole wheat or even multi-grain breads as a snack, since we switched to sprouted multi-grain they only eat it as toast in the morning and for sandwiches at lunch)

We always have apples and pre-washed baby carrots. Also very cheap!

We always have a variety of cheese sticks (string, monterey jack, cheddar).

We always have frozen berries/mixed fruit for smoothies (no juice ever! and yogurt is optional).

We always have peanut butter that only contains peanuts and a little salt. (No added sugar, oils, flavorings, preservatives etc)

We always have honey and reduced sugar preserves (the limit is 8 grams of sugar/serving, never any sugar substitute).

We always have eggs. They're cheap, fast to cook, and if you have kids that eat them hardboiled, they're easy to prepare in advance and keep for snacks. My kids could peel eggs by the time they were 6, hunger is a powerful motivator to be independent:)

We always have a variety of tea. Most kids love "Good Earth sweet and spicy herbal tea" prepared with milk and a little honey, and iced fruit teas sweetened with honey; both are caffeine free.

We always have a variety of dried, cheese filled, mini-ravioli/mini-tortellini for after school snack. Cooks in 17 minutes and it has a good balance of fat and protein, its low sugar and reasonable on salt. Add real cheese or sauce, and a side of fruit/veggies per the kids request and you've got a healthy, inexpensive, after school snack that will keep them out of your kitchen for a couple hours. (Cooked pasta also keeps/reheats well, I always make extra so that I'm not back in the kitchen for whichever kid is having a growth spurt that week:)

These are all 'fast' foods. Do they cost more than pre-packaged/drive-thru junk food? Initially yes, sometimes, but you won't be hungry as often so you don't have to buy as much. They also cost less than co-pays, take less time than doctors appointments, and teach your kids about health and nutrition.

 

 

 

Sunday, November 15, 2009 10:58:03 AM

It is easy to cut down on salt to some degree especially on meats.

I use Papain for a meat tenderizer (Food Lion brand).

This is a natural extract of papaya and has no MSG or other chemicals.

When using Papain you do not need any additional salt as the Papain is a flavor enhancer as well as a tenderizer.

I sprinkle on fresh/frozen vegetables as well and again reduces my need to add salt.

There is no reason that manufacturers could not replace some of the sodium with Papain and do us all a favor.

Sunday, November 15, 2009 10:37:07 AM

@ supernursechris,   Having ADHD you would think you would be staying away from something which contributes to it (soda). I had it when I was a child. Eating proper foods

will get rid of most of those tendencies. Caffeine will add to them!

@  Leann77   Smoking is off-topic. We all know the horrors, and more people die from smoking related disease, which burden us taxpayers, then alcohol related deaths. Check your facts.

Use your spell check!

 

It isn't that hard.

Start by eating (spelt) bread, with high grains, and greens with fruits. I use a juicer which doesn't waste a drop, to combine them since I hate the taste of greens.

Getting off the salt, was easy. I never ate it as a child, and if someone was offering chips, I went for those with the lowest sodium content. Yes [leann77] we need salt, but not as much as most americans eat.  Also You would be better off taking B vitamins, to get your antioxidants instead of dark chocolate.

 

Sunday, November 15, 2009 10:27:49 AM

As a small child I had a spiteful stepfather, each meal was a nightmare of him shaking  an excessive amount of salt and pepper onto any food that my mother put in front of me.  I was required to eat it, him telling me if I didn't eat what was good for me I would die. I was forced to eat excessive globs of fat on any meat, even though I would have a gag reflex and be upset. I was forced to eat bacon fat on pancakes.   When I had babies my mother put salt into their processed baby foods, so it would have flavor. I'm older now and I wonder just how may parents are to blame for the last two generations of obese people walking around out there.  Pile on the salt came from more than one place and mind set, not just food companies.  Ps My stepfather died at 48 yrs. I lived with the end results of ignorance and I think that continues in every level of society today.

Sunday, November 15, 2009 10:26:08 AM
you dont want your kids eating junk?? try sitting down with your kids once in a while and talk to them about eating healthy. just add it to your list of things to talk to your kid about. be a good parent for once and stop blaming others for your laziness
Sunday, November 15, 2009 10:24:37 AM

while i also agree that we need to watch our sugar and salt intake, people need to realize some things and quit getting so hyped up over it. some say that we should just eat fruit instead. while fruit is more nutritious than a candy bar (fat, calories, etc.) i hope you realize that you get a ton of sugar from fruit also. "well it's natural sugar so it should be different...right?" wrong. sucrose is sucrose, and fructose is fructose, and so on. your body does not see sugar from a fruit any differently than sugar from a sugar bowl. people need to also understand that sugar and sodium are vital for a healthy body (believe it or not). while too much is not good for you, you need a small amount of both every day for energy and proper cellular function. it's one of those catch 22 things. have some, but not too much. 

Sunday, November 15, 2009 10:17:22 AM
As always, it becomes a crusade against all manufacturing companies and restaurants. But where is our own personal responsibility?? Just like drugs, alcohol, cigarrettes, etc. we all have a mind to choose. I personally fight against my food addiction all the time. I know what is good for me and what isn't. At the moment I am on a low fat and low sodium diet....I'm doing fine.  I hate people who attack places like Mcdonalds. Leave them alone. The only person you should be mad at is yourself
Sunday, November 15, 2009 10:02:12 AM
The sweetness of fruits is enough for me and I'll take dark over milk chocolate any day. It took me a while to get to this point, but after I spoke to a nutritionist and found out all of the horrible things sugar does to one's body, I changed my ways. Now soda is unpalatable to me. As far as the salt, I really think adding lemon juice is a great way to get a similar flavor b/c I miss salt the most on my veggies.  If you do like salt, I would recommend a good exercise routine and drinking a reasonable amount of water. Even you don't I would recommend it too. I think it's the best "medicine" there is.
1-10 of 35
To add a comment, pleasesign in

Popular Slide Shows

  • Fuel For Love // (© Rob Fiocca/FoodPix/Jupiterimages)
  • Do Anti-Cancer Superfoods Work? // (© Big Cheese Photo/Jupiterimages)
nutrition videos
4 free tools for fitness//© MSN Health & FitnessWeight Loss CalculatorsCustomized Workouts The Fit ZoneLose 10 Pounds
Train by Type//© MSN Health & Fitness
find a nutritionist

Powered by Bing

MSN Health & Fitness does not provide medical or any other health care advice, diagnosis or treatment.



IMA Winner 2009