2Next >

Clean eating means choosing fruits, vegetables and meats that are raised, grown and sold with minimal processing. Often they're organic, and rarely (if ever) should they contain additives. But in some cases, the methods of today's food producers are neither clean nor sustainable. The result is damage to our health, the environment, or both. So we decided to take a fresh look at food through the eyes of the people who spend their lives uncovering what's safe—or not—to eat. We asked them a simple question: "What foods do you avoid?" Their answers don't necessarily make up a "banned foods" list. But reaching for the suggested alternatives might bring you better health—and peace of mind.

Top 10 reasons to go organic.

What the endocrinologist won't eat: canned tomatoes

Fredrick Vom Saal, Ph.D., is an endocrinologist at the University of Missouri who studies bisphenol-A.

The problem: The resin linings of tin cans contain bisphenol-A, a synthetic estrogen that has been linked to ailments ranging from reproductive problems to heart disease, diabetes and obesity. Unfortunately, acidity (a prominent characteristic of tomatoes) causes BPA to leach into your food. Studies show that the BPA in most people's body exceeds the amount that suppresses sperm production or causes chromosomal damage to the eggs of animals. "You can get 50 mcg of BPA per liter out of a tomato can, and that's a level that is going to impact people, particularly the young," says vom Saal. "I won't go near canned tomatoes."

Bing Search: Nutrition
View results for:

The solution: Choose tomatoes in glass bottles (which do not need resin linings), such as the brands Bionaturae and Coluccio. You can also get several types in Tetra Pak boxes, like Trader Joe's and Pomi.

Budget tip: If your recipe allows, substitute bottled pasta sauce for canned tomatoes. Look for pasta sauces with low sodium and few added ingredients, or you may have to adjust the recipe.

Too busy to cook? Eat what the nutritionist would eat at a fast-food place.

What the farmer won't eat: corn-fed beef

Joel Salatin is co-owner of Polyface Farms and author of half a dozen books on sustainable farming.

The problem: Cattle evolved to eat grass, not grains. But farmers today feed their animals corn and soybeans, which fatten up the animals faster for slaughter. But more money for cattle farmers (and lower prices at the grocery store) means a lot less nutrition for us. A recent comprehensive study conducted by the USDA and researchers from Clemson University found that compared with corn-fed beef, grass-fed beef is higher in beta-carotene, vitamin E, omega-3s, conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), calcium, magnesium and potassium; lower in inflammatory omega-6s; and lower in saturated fats that have been linked to heart disease. "We need to respect the fact that cows are herbivores, and that does not mean feeding them corn and chicken manure," says Salatin.

The solution: Buy grass-fed beef, which can be found at specialty grocers, farmers' markets and nationally at Whole Foods. It's usually labeled because it demands a premium, but if you don't see it, ask your butcher.

Budget tip: Cuts on the bone are cheaper because processors charge extra for deboning. You can also buy direct from a local farmer, which can be as cheap as $5 per pound. To find a farmer near you, search eatwild.com.

2Next >
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1-10 of 306
Monday, November 23, 2009 11:58:11 PM

Thank you Max Dan
I believe  the very same

and I like to try Organic food as well

but I find no differnence only in Price,,
my Friend  want eat my Food , so I dont invite her anymore  for a meal ,
safes me money,
how fanatic can one get??
i eat anything what is not poison,

good on you MaxDan,,
may god keep your Tatyfarm going  forever,,,

Yarra Valley in VIC Australie  greets a Smartman,,
simona-09

Sunday, November 22, 2009 7:51:45 AM
If only people really knew what they were eating....  The average ignorance regarding food ingredients is amazing. We will all look back on these times one day & feel foolish.
Saturday, November 21, 2009 9:19:10 AM

No you don’t understand.  What I’m saying is GE is a key tool to the hard task we have to face.  Organic is also a key to this as is conventional agricultural production.  We cannot survive on only organics.  This is undisputed scientific fact.  Coexistence with all these production methods is important to our future.  GE products have been consumed for over 10 years by billions of people and there has not been one documented death or illness from consuming a GE product.  The benefits from advanced plant breeding far outweigh the risks. 

Some people have recommended sensationalized, Michael-Moore-like books that that are as biased as this article.  I would also like to make a recommendation, read Tomorrow’s Table by Pamela C. Ronald. This is a very balanced book on this topic and a very interesting read.   The authors are husband and wife.  She is a molecular biologist and her husband an organic farmer.   It talks about their differences but also how they respect each other’s point of view and how they coexist.   

PS - corn is a grass, so technically corn fed cattle are grass fed cattle.  Remember California cows are happy cows and much of them eat silage.  Silage is just the whole corn plant ground up, grain and all.

Friday, November 20, 2009 9:08:07 PM
Are you really telling me that for the better of humanity, that we need to roll over and accept that GM foods are the only viable option? Either we die of starvation by 2050, or we die by genetic mutation of the human race by the year 2040 while in the process of transferring ourselves to GM only foods. If you feel like GM's are the only option, you need to think outside of the box. Humanity will not be sustainable with GM's. Monsanto cares nothing about the population. Youtube Monsanto videos.
Friday, November 20, 2009 3:07:28 PM

Check out the label on Wal-mart's milk; it has a disclaimer at the bottom that states "According to the FDA, there is no significant difference between milk derived from rBHT treated and non-rBHT treated cows." Do we believe the article, or the label on the milk?

 

 

Friday, November 20, 2009 9:05:09 AM
"Cattle evolved to eat grass"?  Oh brother!  Cattle, like everything else around us were so obviously designed (and designed to eat grass) that to say they evolved takes someone who is either not very observant of their surroundings or just plain gullible (believe everything they read or hear that everything we see around us came from nothing and evolved into the world we find ourselves in). 
Thursday, November 19, 2009 7:20:43 PM

i grew up on a farm and we did not only grow potatoes, but we also raised dairy cows and beef cows. the statements that a farmer would not eat his own potatoes because of the pesticides is a joke. first of all they don't "OD" the potatoes on insecticides like the article is suggesting, that would kill the potatoes also. We ate these potatoes every day (and yes they will sprout) and never had a problem. we also fed our cows corn, grains, etc. but any dairy man will tell you that they do not use this feed constantly. it is expensive, and unrealistic. the reason why you would use these foods on dairy cows is because studies show that if you give cows grains etc (every so often) they will produce more milk. I think people have been getting on this huge organic kick lately without any reliable research done to prove that it is "better" for you. my grandmother is 92 and ate fruit, potatoes, milk, etc all grown or produced on her farm. During all this time they used many different insecticides (some known now to be very dangerous ex: DDT) and various chemicals. she has never been sickly, and up until a couple of years ago was able to be completely independent.

Thursday, November 19, 2009 6:10:59 PM
My grandpa eats a tomato every day, fresh from his garden in the summer, and from a can in the winter instead of the nasty hothouse tomatoes in the store.  He's fathered 4 children, has a perfect ticker, is not diabetic, and has never been overweight his entire life.  Oh, and he just turned 92.
Thursday, November 19, 2009 4:19:44 PM

Ladies and Gentlemen,

It is obvious this article touched a nerve for many people.  I was equally disturbed by the inaccuracies and the bias from the author.  However there is a big picture here….by the year 2050 the world population will grow to a level that will demand twice the amount of food we grow today.  We will need to supply this food demand with fewer resources, less water, less land and less chemicals.  The Farmer is faced with the daunting task to produce more with less.  If we are to meet this challenge we need more than organic or conventional growing conditions.  We need all the tools we can get to achieve this task.  Biotechnology is really one of the few hopes we have.  Many in the population will cringe at this statement but…. sustainability through biotechnology is really a viable answer.  Here is a look at the past, present and future what advanced plant breeding does:

Past

·         Genetically Engineered Corn, Cotton and Soybean have decreased pesticide use by 62 million pounds,  fuel use by 475 million gallons and carbon dioxide emission by more than 22 billion pounds.

·        Yields of major agronomic crops have doubled over the last 75 years, due to advanced genetics.

·         Third world countries have gone from near famine and importers of food to exporters of food.

Present

·         The development of golden rice will save thousands upon thousands of young lives in poor malnourished countries.

·         Plants that produce high cellulose will make biofuel production more economical and decrease our demand on foreign oil.

·        Genetic engineered plants are developed to produce food oils that are healthier (non-transfats).

·         Plastics from plants that are renewable and biodegradable are better for the environment.

Future

·         Drought tolerant crops will soon be available and able to be planted in harsh dry conditions thus increasing the available land to grow more food.

·         Nitrogen fixation a natural quality in some plants will soon be in agronomic crops saving the environment millions of pounds of pollution each year.

·         The tobacco plant- the plant responsible for killing millions of people could someday be the cure to the dreadful disease it has caused.

 

Sustainability through biotechnology……….it’s coming.

Thursday, November 19, 2009 2:28:24 PM
The paragraph regarding grass-fed beef seems to be a little broad in judgment. As a beef cattle producer myself I am well aware of the study from the USDA but I think that consumers should look into how these items were actually tested before judging that grain- fed beef is less healthy. With Salatin's comment the public is being misinformed about the feed program that beef producers have their cattle on- we DONT feed our cattle chicken manure!!! Remember that we have to consume the product as well so we are going to make sure that it is a quality product.
1-10 of 306
To add a comment, pleasesign in

Popular Slide Shows

  • Fuel For Love // (© Rob Fiocca/FoodPix/Jupiterimages)
  • Do Anti-Cancer Superfoods Work? // (© Big Cheese Photo/Jupiterimages)
nutrition videos
4 free tools for fitness//© MSN Health & FitnessWeight Loss CalculatorsCustomized Workouts The Fit ZoneLose 10 Pounds
Train by Type//© MSN Health & Fitness
find a nutritionist

Powered by Bing

MSN Health & Fitness does not provide medical or any other health care advice, diagnosis or treatment.



IMA Winner 2009