More time watching the tube means less time learning to speak, researchers say.

THURSDAY, June 4 (HealthDay News) -- Television reduces verbal interaction between parents and infants, which could delay children's language development, says a U.S. study that challenges claims that certain infant-targeted DVDs actually benefit youngsters.

The researchers studied 329 children, aged 2 months to 48 months, and found that for each additional hour of television exposure, there was a decrease of 770 words (7 percent) heard from an adult by the children. The study also found that the more hours spent watching television, the fewer vocalizations infants made when adults talked to them.

"Some of these reductions are likely due to children being left alone in front of the television screen, but others likely reflect situations in which adults, though present, are distracted by the screen and not interacting with their infant in a discernable manner," wrote Dr. Dimitri A. Christakis, of Seattle Children's Hospital, and colleagues.

"At first blush, these findings may seem entirely intuitive. However, these findings must be interpreted in light of the fact that purveyors of infant DVDs claim that their products are designed to give parents and children a chance to interact with one another, an assertion that lacks empirical evidence," they noted.

The researchers added that their results may help explain previous findings of a link between television viewing and delayed language development.

"Given the critical role that adult caregivers play in children's linguistic development, whether they talk to their child while the screen is on may be critical and explain the effects that are attributed to content or even amount of television watched," the team wrote. "That is, whether parents talk less (or not at all) during some types of programs or at some times of the day may be as important in this age group as what is being watched."

The study appears in the June issue of the Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine.

More information

The U.S. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders outlines speech and language milestones.

SOURCE: JAMA/Archives journals, news release, June 1, 2009

Copyright @2010 HealthDay. All Rights Reserved.

Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1-10 of 56
Wednesday, June 03, 2009 5:44:55 PM
tv has been around for how long now--come on now get a life
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 10:37:30 PM

Great! Just another usless study about how "bad" TV is.

 

I am 28, and i watched TV as far back as i can rememeber.

 

Guess what..i developed just fine!

 

Dont these people have anything better to do than to give pointless studies?

Tuesday, June 02, 2009 10:35:17 PM
read brain books; brain gym; then you might;  actually have a point about TV is the cause; if we do not limit tv; watching habits. Must - ought to:  Interact and Exercise outside home!Smile
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 10:31:16 PM
you r right! Interaction is the key! But, do most parents know it?, Including day cares..? nannies? 
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 10:23:31 PM
Firstly, "dedicated mommy", relax, no one is saying anything about government regulated TV usage at all. They are simply trying to offer up some notifications about prolonged exposure to TV being linked to a less verbal environment. Read the article again. No one said anything even close to that. Secondly, "Inbetween", you are precisely the person that this research is aimed at addressing. If you honestly believe that "there is nothing more precious" than hearing a child quote Barney, your deep, elemental, human/heart genes must be fried beyond repair, most likely due to watching your own abominable share of TV. Try getting into nature every once in a while. You might actually hear a child comment on a hummingbird or flower or wave. Now that is precious. The rest of you have it perfectly right. TV has been, and yet should not ever be, used as a substitute for real interaction. Children, more than ever, need to get out and move, breathe, explore. We certainly don't need any more half witted, obese, apathetic people in this country. And yes, there are great, educational, entertaining shows on. Find them, watch them and skip the crap. You'll benefit, your child will benefit and the public will benefit from having one less apathetic, lazy, mindless person on the move.
#6
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 10:22:03 PM
people, where are you all from?... TV ( computers etc) might affect "some" children but not all?... It affects ALL children! Ok, you might console yourself that you child is "quicker" and therefore, not as affected as others. So, if, say, you child is affected 20 % compared to a "slower" child's 60%, do you feel better?... This is a classic case of denial! - the facts are in the face, yet, people are trying to rationalize and explain it away. Such studies have been done since long time ago, and I am surprised to even hear about them again, because I thought that they were defeated by all this "new tech age" nonsense and people, who are so successfully selling their stupid tech toys. As for the obesity - it is not just the sedentary lifestyle, but what you feed your children as well as many other factors. Until parents stop feeding their children junk           ( including pre-packaged/frozen/canned/whatever allegedly good food), along with Halloween - through Christmas - till Easter candy, with each child bringing birthday cupcakes to school etc etc etc      ( fill in the blank) , no amount of pre-bed strolling  or backyard frolicking will help solve obesity problem.
#7
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 10:12:02 PM
It should be spelled "ridiculous" and "utterly". Too much TV?
#8
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 10:10:31 PM
such a narrow ignorant point of view. There certainly should be some degree of control over what is being shown on TV, and socialism/communism stuff has nothing to do with it. It is always under some kind of control, for right now - money controls everything, that's why the degree of immorality and filth is rising, catering to the lowest tastes and interests, which allow quick and huge financial profits. So, it would be much better if the control was executed by a group of educated and knowledgeable people, who would be defending the interests of normal people, including children, and who would remove all this garbage from TV channels. By the way, the word, which you spelled "uderly" should be spelled "utterly".
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 8:55:55 PM
The title said "TV may delay babies' speech" and I'm thinking "if the babies have taken the time to write a proper speech, the networks should give them the live airtime they so richly deserve!!"
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 8:49:17 PM
YES DO YOU REALLY NEED A KID THAT TALKS BACK..yes stick them infront of t.v. that will shut them up.....SURE KEEP THEM YAPPING next thing you wish they stay quiet with no vocabulary!
1-10 of 56
To add a comment, pleasesign in

Estimate Your Child's Future Height

MaleFemale

ft.in.
lbs.
ft.in.
ft.in.
Click here to recalculate your child's height.
Your Child's Predicted Height is
Note: This MSN Health & Fitness tool is a best-guess estimate based on the information you provide. Many factors, such as overall health and nutrition, will be a factor in your child’s future height. Please consult a physician if you have concerns about your child’s development. Source: H.J. Khamis and A.F. Roche. Wright State University School of Medicine, 1995.
videos © MSN Health & Fitness

MSN Health & Fitness does not provide medical or any other health care advice, diagnosis or treatment.



IMA Winner 2009