Martica

Q: I started lifting weights because I heard you can burn more calories from lifting than from doing cardio. Is this true? How long should I rest in between the repetitions before starting a new set?

A: There's a lot of confusion about exactly what lifting weights can do for you. One thing is for sure, if you're trying to lose weight, then doing more cardio activities—such as walking, running or using machines like the elliptical trainer—is the way to go.

Weight loss comes from using more calories than you take in. You can use more calories the fastest with activities that use your whole body over an extended period of time, as opposed to doing site-specific exercises that fatigue one particular muscle group or two. Any movement burns calories, but weight training burns calories relatively slowly—especially when it's a novice or recreational exerciser using relatively low weights and performing just a few sets. In contrast, you can double your calorie burn by spending the same amount of time doing an aerobic workout (depending on the intensity).

Walking briskly for 30 minutes will burn more calories than doing a half-hour's worth of biceps curls, ab crunches or shoulder raises, for example. If you are substituting cardio workouts with more muscle-based workouts such as body sculpting or Pilates, you will burn fewer calories over the week and that will slow down your rate of weight loss.

You can burn more calories during a weights workout by performing more lower-body moves such as squats and lunges, or doing a circuit-style routine where you move quickly through the routine and even insert cardio intervals such as jumping jacks or jogging in place in between exercises. There is some evidence that a very intense, super-hard weights workout can create a slight caloric afterburn. But typical exercisers simply don’t push themselves this much. So overall, cardio is more efficient at burning the most calories.

You will, no doubt, hear differently. And you will probably come across claims that dumbbells provide a magical solution. If you lift weights, the argument goes, you build muscle, which speeds up your metabolism so that you even burn more calories while you sleep.

But this is more hype than hope. Leading exercise physiologists conducted a comprehensive review of the research on exercise and weight loss for the American College of Sports Medicine and presented their findings at a 2003 conference. While resistance training was recommended for its beneficial role in potentially improving muscle, strength and power, they found no evidence that it enhanced weight loss, especially when combined with dieting.

One claim—that muscle weight burns more calories, and so adding muscle makes you burn more calories every day—may be true in theory. But, in reality, it's probably not making a big enough difference for most people. First, this effect may be less powerful than most people believe. Often the information about muscles and metabolism is misconstrued. A common claim is that every extra pound of muscle burns from 30 to 50 calories per day. Some sources cite that one pound of muscle can burn an extra 100 calories per day. This "fact" has been repeated by trainers everywhere, but few have bothered to investigate the actual research where these claims originated. 

In reality, one pound of muscle burns about seven to 15 calories a day, not 50, explains Dymphna Gallagher, the director of the body composition unit at the New York Obesity Research Center in Manhattan. So, if a person has managed to stick to a program lifting progressively heavier weights for a long enough stretch of time, they may accumulate enough extra muscle to boost their metabolism by about 14 to 30 calories a day—not several hundred, as is often claimed.

One of the foremost experts on the science of strength training concurs: "The effect on metabolism is minor and certainly not the savior of dieters," says William Kraemer, a professor of physiology and neurobiology at the University of Connecticut.

When it comes to dieting with weight training, dieting may thwart any possible effect. The body needs more calories than normal to build muscle. A person trying to cut back will have a harder time producing an anabolic effect in their body where it grows new muscle tissue.

That's not to say that lifting weights won't help you get stronger, firmer and healthier. It will. But it just isn't the place to focus if you are trying to shed lots of weight. You can develop more stamina from lifting weights, which in turn may help you last longer during cardio workouts—so, definitely include one to three sessions a week of weight training into your routine for this purpose. But to burn calories, do cardio more often and for longer periods.

As far as how long to rest between sets, how long you wait depends upon your goal, as well as how much weight you're lifting and how many reps and sets you're doing. Between-set breaks usually last anywhere from 30 seconds to 5 minutes. Unless you are lifting very heavy weights, you can shorten the rest periods. Rest intervals of about a minute in between sets are more effective at increasing strength than a shorter interval. But different exercises may require different durations. A good gauge is to aim for about one minute and make sure your muscles feel like they have recovered in between sets.

Find More from Martica:

Find all articles by Martica.

Do you have a fitness or weight-loss question for Martica? Send e-mail to experts@microsoft.com. Please include Ask Martica in the subject line. Each of our experts responds to one question each week and the responses are posted on Mondays on MSN Health. We regret that we cannot provide a personalized response to every submission.


Martica is a Manhattan-based exercise physiologist and nutritionist and an award-winning fitness instructor. She has written for a variety of publications including Self , Health , Prevention , The New York Times and others. Martica is the author of seven books, including her latest, - Cross-Training for Dummies . (Read her full bio.)

Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1-7 of 7
Thursday, July 23, 2009 6:14:10 AM
OMG this woman is talking out of her skinny-fat  butt!! I much rather have a body of a sculpted sprinter than a marathon runner...ewww
Saturday, July 18, 2009 6:01:46 AM
I used to do step aerobics everyday then my 95lb friend who was lifting to gain wgt lost her partner and I stepped in the fill the gap. I thought "I've been doing step class 5 days a week with a few dumbbells I can keep up" so I lifted the same as my 95lb friend..... holy crap was I ever sore.... nothing I had done before had compared...... so I scraped the step class and started lifting. I can't describe what happened to my body. I lost inches and became addicted to the after workout pain....I realized it felt gooood to be sore,(in moderation of course) because as I continued I saw less fat and these beautiful muscles..... In all my dieting and step class  and other aerobics I never saw such fast fat loss and resculpting of my body.  I've move away from my partner and over the years let myself get back out of shape, so it's back to the gym for some weight pumping fat loss. It's the fastest way to take off inches and when you start feeling the strength and solid muscle developing and as you peel off the fat you'll start seeing the muscle.... what a image builder it is.....No the scales don't move the way running and starving yourself does, so don't worry about the numbers just look in the mirror and go buy new close and the inches come off.
Thursday, July 09, 2009 7:44:19 AM
I would have to disagree with her on some points. Granted, cardio creates a calorie deficit and its a good cardio vascular conditioning but it will not do more than that. It is a PROVEN fact that as your heart rate passes 70% of your max heart rate (MHR), The percent of burned fat calories drops from 85% to less than 50% and further down to 15% at 80%-90% MHR .   If you keep your weight training such that your heart rate doesn't go too high, most of the calories you burn are fat calories, and that's how you lose fat.

Sunday, June 21, 2009 7:56:35 AM
Why can't people say that we need both?  Cardio needs help from weight lifting and weightlifting needs help from cardio.  I've always been at odds with my weight, but one time when I lost a ton of weight, I was working at a job where you needed not only "cardio" but you had to have physical strength more so.  I was the strongest I'd ever been and in some serious shape.  And by the way I weighed at least 220-230 lbs.  Let's just say that I'm not your typical fat woman.
Saturday, June 20, 2009 11:49:07 AM

Hello Martica Heaner- M.A., M.Ed,  Poppycock! And I doubt if you'll ever read this. But you are resting on archaic research dispositions and bias built in to the data, even if they researched weights versus cardio one minute ago with the top people in the world or the Fellows of ACSM! Bias rules - in any study and they sway the results, no matter the "Empirical Evidence" and that is most certainly true in your quite dated, article. You courteously dismiss weights as a factor, much less a method in which to manage body fat - as muscles, "Smooth, Cardiac and of course, Skeletal muscles are the engines in which the body transforms one energy into another. Your argument, is that cardio (which is in itself an ambiguous term), since we're aerobic at rest - and certainly whilst strength training, is superior in terms of its calorie burning output. I would ask you this: Can you prove unequivocally that walking, jogging, running or any other for of bipedalling out burns a real-weight workout? I would wager, NO!

 

Studies don't acknowledge intensity as it relates to calories expended. You only mildly state that folks don't usually work hard enough - (so just do cardio longer and longer). Okay, that's practical, not really.

 

Do another study - and this time, remove your personal bias and try again. Weight training has many more benefits than bipedally around - less impact, and unless you walk on your hands - your upper body bones structure isn't going to benefit from the weight bearing activity of a jog or a passive walk. Lastly - when you personally are 85 years old - and want to get out of a chair and not drift to the right or left or feel like you're going to fall, think to yourself, "let's see here - is my heart muscle giving me balance or are my glutes, triceps, lats, delts, traps, biceps, abs and obliques and chest? And if I fall - will I be able to catch myself or will I crumple under my own body weight because I've never used weights consistently hard & intense enough to stop my fall?!" I doubt it Martica. I ask you to lift weights 4 days a week - for 30 minutes, until you really feel the burn - and get a little sore too - and focus, breathe and push yourself, then you'll know what I am talking about. Then -- do your study - over!

 

Thank you, Coach Dan : www.fitnessintraining.com

 

"There is some evidence that a very intense, super-hard weights workout can create a slight caloric afterburn. But typical exercisers simply don’t push themselves this much. So overall, cardio is more efficient at burning the most calories."
Wednesday, May 20, 2009 12:56:24 PM
Tony, I agree, this lady has no clue obviously. I have made a career out of gaining and losing weight. I can say this for sure, when I want to lose weight fast, I focus on intense weight training in circuit format. What the author fails to mention is that based on visual observation at the gym, very few people perform cardio at a pace or level that contributes to significant calorie loss either. I have seen person after person take an hour to burn 300 calories. Assuming they have the determination to do this every day, that isn't even 1 lb per week. Any workout, cardio or strength comes down to what you put into it. Her supposed study is flawed that states that strength training doesn't contribute to weight loss. If it burns calories it can contribute to weight loss. 
Wednesday, May 20, 2009 6:53:10 AM
****!!! the whole reason you have a cardiorespiratory syatem is to bring nutrients and oxygen to the muscles and organs, and to take wastes away. "Cardio" is not something you exercise by itself- you have to move to do cardio, and moving requires muscle.  With me so far? Good....now if you walk  around, you are functioning just above your resting metabolic rate, so you won't burn too many more calories than if you sit down. If you jog, you use more muscle and therefore burn more calories, but your body adjusts to this by dropping excess weight, including muscle. Fat doesn't burn calories, muscle does. If you use resistance exercises, such as weightlifting, you use the most muscle, and by not taking long rests between sets, you will obviously get a "cardio" workout. The exercises the author lists here are  not resistant enough to make a cardio difference.
1-7 of 7
To add a comment, pleasesign in

Popular Slide Shows

  • AHDH Foods to Eat & Avoid // (© White Rock/DAJ/Getty Images)
  • Guys: Your Best Body in One Hour // (© Images courtesy of Men's Health)

Bing Shopping

Video workouts//© MSN Health & Fitness
4 free tools for fitness//© MSN Health & FitnessWeight Loss CalculatorsCustomized Workouts The Fit ZoneLose 10 Pounds
find a health club//© MSN Health & Fitness

Powered by Bing

MSN Health & Fitness does not provide medical or any other health care advice, diagnosis or treatment.



IMA Winner 2009